[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving

To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
Subject: RE: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:50:47 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <040d01c15d96$7ccfb830$0a04a8c0@dieboldes.com>

A separate entity is precisely what I want to avoid.

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:49 PM
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving

How about a separate utility, outside of GEMS, just to upload audit logs? Each audit log would be identified with the vote center/machine ID combination, then logged to large capacity media such as CD. Audit logs uploaded in this manner would not be incorporated into GEMS.

Nel

References:
- Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
  - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>

Prev by Date: Re: BS Audit Log Upload - 22 month archiving
Next by Date: Prevent races with many candidates snaking to the next column
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread