RE: travis, tx database

["Cathy Colgan" <cacglobal@earthlink.net>]

you are right we don't want cumulative reportunits.

They have asked for an ascii, delimited file to combine results with their
existing system.

they report precinct by precinct in TX.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken
Clark
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:01 PM
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: travis, tx database


I don't have all the facts here, but let me perhaps put this in a little
stronger terms anyway.  Its *unlikely* you want cumulative reportunits.
Certainly El Paso TX doesn't do them that way, so it would seem doubtful
Travis would.  Have you run GEMS zero reports, and are they the way that the
county expects?  If this is a trial election, how are they getting their
results out of GEMS and into their existing system?  Are they doing this
precinct-by-precinct?

Ken




> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Talbot
> Iredale
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 5:08 PM
> To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> Subject: Re: travis, tx database
>
>
> Cathy,
>
> The problem is that base precincts 200-TA and 225-TA are not in the
> cumulative reportunit.
>
> Again, do you really want cumulative reportunits, or do you really mean
> cumulative vote centers?
>
> Tab
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cathy Colgan" <cacglobal@earthlink.net>
> To: "RCR" <rcr@dieboldes.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:58 AM
> Subject: travis, tx database
>
>
> > RE:  from database sent 10/14.
> >
> > I selected the Automatic L & A and selected on ballot from each
> precinct.
> >
> > The screen shows 295 ballots.  The database shows 297 base precincts.
> >
> > The report shows only votes in FOR- 0 votes AGAINST
> >
> > i don't think this is right but am i not reading it correctly?