RE: New Report for Alameda CA

["Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>]

I have one question.  What do they *really* want here.  Ballot Styles with
Precincts, Ballots with Precincts, Card Styles with Precincts, or Cards with
Precincts?

Ken


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Dmitry
> Papushin
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:32 AM
> To: rcr@dieboldes.com
> Subject: Re: New Report for Alameda CA
>
>
> This is done and will be in the next GEMSReports release.
>
> Dmitry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Chen <rcglobal@earthlink.net>
> To: Rcr@Gesn.Com <rcr@dieboldes.com>; Dmitry Papushin <dmitry@dieboldes.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 6:59 PM
> Subject: New Report for Alameda CA
>
>
> > Request: New report, Ballot Styles with Report Precincts
> > Jurisdiction: Alameda CA
> > Date Due: ASAP
> > Application: AVTS Early Voting
> >
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > We are using AVTS units to do early voting in Alameda County, CA.  In
> > California, they have to report absentees by precinct...unfortunately
> there
> > are over 1100 precincts.  Instead of trying to proof or do L&A
> testing on
> > 1100 AVTS ballots, we can check only the ballot styles (only
> 134).  But it
> > is hard to separate them.  There is currently a report that shows Report
> > Precincts with Ballot Styles, can you give the reverse?  Ballot Styles
> with
> > Report Precincts.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > rob