[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Voter Group Header assignment for generation of separate ballots

To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
Subject: RE: Voter Group Header assignment for generation of separate ballots
From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 15:57:27 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <NCBBIGGNCKBDKCCGPEOAKEIBDFAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

For 1.11 at least, the best I can offer is a work around. Create a race with no candidates as a psudo significant header. This race will differentiate the ballots for GEMS. This race can be the "Official Ballot" header, or something more inert like a seperator with actual significant headers in turn attached to it.

It appears GEMS is generating more ballots then expected when using two voter group 2's. People have up 'til now been creating just one vgroup2 for special absentee ballots. Gwinnett will need two, one for polling and one for absentee.

Its a simple bug. Fix will be in the next 11, 14, and 15 releases.

Ken

References:
- RE: Voter Group Header assignment for generation of separate ballots
  - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Voter Group Header assignment for generation of separate ballots
Next by Date: Lockup after overvote override - 1.95d
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread