next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: An analysis of one Previous: Bibliography

Figures

Figure 2: The autocorrelation of $ d$.
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{autocor.ps}}

Figure 3: The ratio of two successive periods of the mark.
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{stairs.ps}}

Figure 4: Output of our detection algorithm with $ p=30$ on the original song $ A$ and its marked counterpart $ AM$.
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{detector.eps}}

Figure 5: Output of our detection algorithm with $ p=30$ on our newly produced song $ C$ and its marked counterpart $ B$.
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{detectorb.eps}}

Figure 6: Output of our detection algorithm with $ p=450$ on the four songs $ A,AM,B$ and $ C$.
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{detector2.eps}}

Figure 7: Comparison between the mark recovered from the difference $ D=AM-A$ and the mark recovered from $ BM$.
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{marks.ps}}

Figure 8: Comparison between $ S[j]$ and $ S'[j]-S[j]$ in the frequency domain. Note that most of the energy of $ S[j]$ is contained in the low frequency
\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics*{ds.ps}}


next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: An analysis of one Previous: Bibliography
Julien Stern 2001-01-05