[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate

To: <support@gesn.com>
Subject: RE: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:11:28 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <01f101c0cf60$bff553f0$0a04a8c0@gesn.com>

It should be possible to add support for this. What's it worth to you?

Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Nel Finberg
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:27 PM
To: support
Subject: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate

Is there any reason why an endorsement party cannot be selected when adding a registered write-in candidate?

Nel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
  - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@gesn.com>

References:
- GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
  - From: "Nel Finberg" <nel@gesn.com>

Prev by Date: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
Next by Date: Re: GEMS 1-17-11-2 adding registered write-in candidate
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread