Re: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS

["Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>]

I guess we'll have to talk on the phone about it, I'm still not getting it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Hintz" <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
To: <support@gesn.com>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS


> The cards are printed with names Precinct No. 1, Precinct No. 2, etc. and
> not the names of the Reporting Precincts from Gems.
>
> Also, there is not a sequential match.  The Reporting Precincts do not
> necessarily go in sequential order with the Precinct Header Cards.  After
> you program an election, go to the Pre Election Reports - Precinct Header
> Cards, and you will see which Precinct ID matches your corresponding
> Reporting Precinct.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
> Steve Knecht
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 1:09 PM
> To: support@gesn.com
> Subject: Re: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS
>
>
> Thanks Jeff.  What do you mean the precinct cards are generic, not
> necessarily sequential?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Hintz <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
> To: <support@gesn.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 11:07 AM
> Subject: RE: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS
>
>
> > We did Pct. Header cards for Puerto Rico.  They had only 1 style, but
had
> > around 1700 pcts.  It worked fine for Central Count.  However, the
> printing
> > of the Pct. Header cards are generic, and not necessarily sequential
with
> > the Gems Reporting Precincts.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
> > Steve Knecht
> > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Global Support
> > Subject: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS
> >
> >
> >
> > > Has anyone used Pct. Header cards with GEMS central count?  I seem to
> > recall
> > > some problem with that in the past - that it had never been done or
> > > something.
> > >
> > > The issue seems to be in Alameda where they use the Spectrum ABS
process
> > and
> > > want to use automated inserting of ballots.   By breaking up ballot
> groups
> > > into 134 styles vs. 1117 precincts, their roadmap for filling the
> inserter
> > > and the numbers of ballots they can pull and insert becomes much
easier.
> > > But they want to count by precinct when they come back.  Can this be
> > tested
> > > relatively easily by someone in support?
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ginnold, Elaine, ROV <eginnold@co.alameda.ca.us>
> > > To: 'Steve Knecht' <skglobal@earthlink.net>
> > > Cc: Clark, Brad, ROV <bclark@co.alameda.ca.us>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 12:42 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Provisionals
> > >
> > >
> > > > Steve,
> > > > I'd also like to talk to you about counting av's by precinct and how
> to
> > do
> > > > this without having to order ballots for every precinct.
> > > >
> > > > Elaine Ginnold
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > ----------
> > > > > From: Steve Knecht[SMTP:skglobal@earthlink.net]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 5:33 PM
> > > > > To: Brad Clark; Elaine Ginnold
> > > > > Subject: Provisionals
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to understand more about the "long term" provisional
> > > requirements
> > > > > you see for Alameda County.  I understand that for Piedmont and
> > Oakland
> > > > > we're using op scan ballots.  However, let's sit down together and
> > make
> > > > > sure the requirements are clear as we move forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > Brad, I've got your demo unit.  I'll be out of town next Monday
> > through
> > > > > Thursday.  Is next Friday OK to bring it to you?  Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Knecht
> > > > > Global Election Systems
> > > > > 415-893-9941 office   415-893-9951 fax
> > > > > 415-225-6591 cell       800-508-5710 pager
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>