I hate to say
anything here, but it doesn't make sense to have the fonts
inconsistent IMHO. The whole rationale for dropping Arial Narrow is to
avoid complications with print shops and AVTS units that can't handle
it. Either the database is contaminated with Arial Narrow or it
is not however. Further, the advantages of Arial Narrow (squeeze more
text) apply equally well to candidates and long race
text.
To be absolutely
clear though: I am not saying we should drop Arial Narrow or
not. I have no strong opinion on that. I am just saying dropping
it for races but not candidates doesn't make a lot of sense.
Certainly, I can see no advantage to doing
that.
Ken
Okay, I'll leave the default fonts for
candidates and endorsements alone (ie Arial Narrow) and make the default
font for Races and Headers to Arial.
Should I change the default size from 10
point to 14 point while I'm at it.
Note: These defaults can be changed in the
'Race Options' Dialog.
Whatever the consensus is I will
work with
A complaint. You just
heard it.
This RCR has been outstanding
for a while. I will change the default font from Arial
Narrow to plain Arial if I do not here a complaint about
this today.
Can the default font in
Gems for all text (candidates, races, headers,
endorsements) be set to Arial and Bold instead of Arial
Narrow - No client I know of uses Arieal Narrow so
we always have to change it .