Re: Red as a second colour

["Nel Finberg" <nel@dieboldes.com>]

Sorry to throw in my two bits here, but I think Greg originally requested
that GEMS allow text components be made red in addition to ovals, so that
red oval artwork separations incorporate these red text components.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian S. Piper <ian@dieboldes.com>
To: ken@dieboldes.com <ken@dieboldes.com>
Cc: Greg Forsythe <jgforsyt@netcom.ca>; Rcr@dieboldes.com <Rcr@dieboldes.com>
Date: Saturday, February 06, 1999 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: Red as a second colour


>Ken Clark wrote:
>
>> > > I've never seen a red oval printout, but I think what Greg is
>> > > looking for is a
>> > > way to take a separate red oval printout (which is just a
>> > > printout of ovals, no
>> > > text I guess) and have some identification on that oval printout
>> > > which allows
>> > > the print shop to match it to the actual ballot layout text.
>> >
>> > This feature will be in the next version of GEMS.  Its a 5 minute
change.
>> > Sorry for the confusion Greg.
>>
>> I spoke too fast (and I have put away the clue hammer).
>>
>> Whitman informs me that we print the card identification text outside the
>> cut marks on the oval plate already, so printers have the means to match
up
>> the plates.  Greg just put that in the rcr to throw me (us) off...
>>
>> Ken
>
>Hi Greg:
>
>If the id is printed on the red oval template, then why did you post the
rcr?
>
>Ian
>