[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Bl,ackhawk County Iowa - pre election report



GEMS-Reports-1-17-22.zip has been posted to fix problems like this one.

Whitman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Whitman Lee" <whitman@dieboldes.com>
To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:01
Subject: Re: Bl,ackhawk County Iowa - pre election report


> GEMS has evolved so many times that it breaks some of the pre-election
> reports, and "Base Precincts with Cards" is one of them.  I am reviewing
all
> the Crystal Reports and will post a latest pack ASAP.
>
> Whitman
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tami" <tkglobal@earthlink.net>
> To: "bugtrack" <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 13:02
> Subject: Bl,ackhawk County Iowa - pre election report
>
>
> > Gems 1.11.9
> >
> > Customer does own programming:
> >
> > proofing pre-election reports
> >
> > Base Precincts with Cards DOES NOT show card 52,53,54 for Jessup
Precinct
> >
> > HOWEVER, Ballots with Base Precincts DOES show card 52,53,54 for Jessup
> > precinct
> >
> >
> > It would appear the card(s) should appear on both reports for Jessup.
> >
> > Is there an explanation?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >