|
I'm taking this to bugtrack since some bugs have
been reported in this e-mail.
OK. I now have a vague idea of the report format.
Based on review with Dmitry I believe the following are bugs:
1. Cards column should equal ballot column, given this was a
single card per voter election.
This is not a problem with the report, this is how
cards-ballots related in the placer's database.
2. The Voters column does not add correctly on a TOTAL TOTAL
ROW.
This is fixed and will be in
GEMS-1-17-23.
3. The polling vs absentee sections do not have the same
format. See last nine rows of absentee (this is OK) and
note how this is not reflected above for
polling.
This is fixed as well, GEMS-1-17-23 will not
display counter group totals breaking by VGroup if there is only one VGroup
record for District/Reportunit.
Dmitry
Unless I'm mistaken, if the bottom nine lines were replicated
for the polling category, the report would work for the counties. That is
they are trying to see how many cards were cast by party in each precinct.
If this were done, I think you could leave off the
VGroup2 colum altogether, fix the Cards/Ballots column, Fix
the Voters totals lines and you'd have a usable report. I think this would
reduce the existing 32 line report to 18 lines plus the final
totals line (for the precinct in question). This may not work in written
form very well.
What do you think Soph?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:09
PM
Subject: RE: Decoding this Cards Cast
Report
If it turns out there
is a “better” way to present all of this information, post it a follow up and
we’ll see what we can do for some future release. The report wasn’t obvious to me either
when I looked at your screen shot.
Ken
-----Original
Message-----
From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]
On Behalf Of Steve
Knecht
Sent: Wednesday, March
13, 2002 3:35 PM
To:
support@dieboldes.com
Subject: Re:
Decoding this Cards Cast Report
Sophia, thanks for the efforts on
this. However, the format of this explanation is difficult for me to
understand. So I'll call you. Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:17 PM
Subject: RE:
Decoding this Cards Cast Report
LINEs in
REPORT
MEANING (I think)
CounterGroup
VGroup1
VGroup2
Cast
Polling
TOTAL NOP
66 -> Total ballots
cast for CounterGroup=Polling AND Vgroup2=NOP.
6(NOP NOP) + 46(DEM
NOP) + 9(REP NOP) + 1(GRN NOP) + 4(AIP NOP)
+
0(LIB NOP) + 0(REF
NOP) + 0(NLP NOP)
Polling
REP
TOTAL 79
-> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Polling AND Vgroup1=REP.
9(REP NOP) + 70(REP
REP)
Polling
TOTAL
TOTAL
136 -> Total ballots cast for
CounterGroup=Polling
6(NOP NOP) + 46(DEM NOP) + 9(REP NOP) + 1(GRN NOP) + 4(AIP NOP)
+
0(LIB NOP) + 0(REF NOP) + 0(NLP NOP) + 70(REP
REP)
Absentee/early TOTAL
NOP
24 -> Total ballots cast for
CounterGroup=Absentee/early AND Vgroup2=NOP
2(NOP NOP) + 21(DEM NOP) + 1(GRN NOP) + 0(AIP NOP) + 0(LIB NOP) 0
+
0 (REF NOP) + 0(NLP
NOP)
Absentee/early
TOTAL REP 29
-> Total ballots cast for CounterGroup=Absentee/early AND Vgroup2=REP
29(REP REP)
Absentee/early
REP
TOTAL
30 -> Total ballots cast for
CounterGroup=Absentee/early AND Vgroup1=REP
1(REP
NOP) + 29(REP
REP)
-----Original
Message-----
From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On
Behalf Of
Steve Knecht
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:18 PM
To:
Global Support
Subject: Decoding this Cards Cast Report
Could
someone in support "decode" these columns for me and tell me what
each
one of them means. Thanks.
----- Original Message
-----
From: Gary Smith <GSmith@placer.ca.gov>
To:
<skglobal@earthlink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:14
PM
Subject: Placer
Steve:
The cards cast report does not
seem to be any different between versions. I
installed the newest
report set. Maybe it has to do with the way we have
our counter
groups setup? Having a separate counter group for the Rep
NP.
I sent a scanned copy of the report, cards cast.tif. It should
open with
standard image viewing software (imagevue) that comes with
windows. It is
in the accessories folder.
Gary
|