[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
I am out of town this week, doing demonstrations in Maryland, and I have
that database on my old laptop at the Omaha office. I will send it to you
when I get back next Monday.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
Ken Clark
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:57 PM
To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
Jeff, I couldn't reproduce this. Please send me your database.
Ken
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
> Jeff Hintz
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:13 AM
> To: support@dieboldes.com
> Subject: RE: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
>
>
> Not a problem on my end. I was just testing it out for Bill Bowers. I
> think that Bill can wait until January.
>
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On
> Behalf Of Ken
> Clark
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 5:00 PM
> To: support@dieboldes.com
> Subject: RE: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
>
> Its possible (probable) that I broke it in 1.18 when I did the @district
> stuff. Can you live without it until Jan? You can fake it with @district
> by creating a district for every precinct and using @district (like with
> precinct committee officer races), but I agree that sucks.
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
> > Greg Forsythe
> > Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 8:58 AM
> > To: support@dieboldes.com
> > Subject: Re: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
> >
> >
> > Hey Jeff
> >
> > Would you mind sending the database or an example so un lesser
> lights can
> > see how it works?
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Hintz" <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
> > To: <support@dieboldes.com>
> > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:00 PM
> > Subject: RE: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
> >
> >
> > > OK, I got it to work with by using the documentation that Nel sent me.
> > > However, I do still have one question, does this new @district macro
> > replace
> > > the @precinct macro. Because I have tried the @precinct
> macro, in GEMS
> > > 1.18.1 and all it prints is @precinct, not the name of the
> > precinct, as it
> > > did in 1.17.17.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com
> [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
> > Ken
> > > Clark
> > > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:00 PM
> > > To: support@dieboldes.com
> > > Subject: @district macro (was RE: Gems)
> > >
> > > It was in GEMS 1.18.1. Post a toy database with @district and a few
> > > districts/precincts/ballots, and I will take a look.
> > >
> > > Here was the feature description:
> > >
> > > https://staff.dieboldes.com/lists/support.w3archive/200107/msg00097.html
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com
> > [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of
> > > > Jeff Hintz
> > > > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:48 AM
> > > > To: support@dieboldes.com
> > > > Subject: RE: Gems
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have tried the @district macro in GEMS 1.18.8, in several
> > > > different ways,
> > > > but I cannot get it to work. What version of GEMS was the @district
> > macro
> > > > first working??? I will try that version then work my way up
> > to see if
> > it
> > > > is a bug.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On
> > > > Behalf Of Ken
> > > > Clark
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:33 AM
> > > > To: support@dieboldes.com
> > > > Subject: RE: Gems
> > > >
> > > > https://staff.dieboldes.com/lists/rcr.w3archive/200102/msg00010.html
> > > >
> > > > Ken
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: owner-support@dieboldes.com
> > [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf
> > Of
> > > > > Jeff Hintz
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:23 AM
> > > > > To: Support Team
> > > > > Subject: FW: Gems
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I received this e-mail from Bill Bowers this morning. I do not
> > > > see in the
> > > > > latest readme file any reference that this has been added into the
> > 1.18
> > > > > versions yet. When I asked for this back in October, Ken
> > > > > specified that it
> > > > > would be added to the 1.18 version. What is the status on this???
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Bill Bowers [mailto:bbowers@gbsvote.net]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:32 AM
> > > > > To: Jeff Hintz
> > > > > Subject: Gems
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Jeff - You had told me that 1.18 would have the
> ability to print
> > the
> > > > > Precinct name on two lines... Has this been done? DuPage county
> > > > > wants this
> > > > > and I was hoping it was in the works....
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks a bunch
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________
> > > > > William Bowers, CMC
> > > > > Governmental Business Systems
> > > > > 150 Shore Drive
> > > > > Burr Ridge IL, 60527
> > > > > (800) 659-1516
> > > > > (877) 847-1715 FAX
> > > > > bbowers@gbsvote.net
> > >
> > >