Thanks
for the reminder on the internal release numbers. Is that also true of the AVTS
code?
Larry
J. Dix
Vice
President of Operations
Global
Election Systems
-----Original
Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:17
PM
To:
bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Cc: Jeff
Dean
Subject: RE: GEMS
1-11-14 South Carolina Export
Because the 4th digit is for internal
releases. This was explained at length some time ago.
And
yes, it does put us in the position where we have to go back to Metamor.
So would calling it 1.11.14.2. As will whatever
new bugs are found in 1.11.15.
Ken
-----Original
Message-----
From:
owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Larry Dix
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:44
AM
To:
bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Cc: Jeff
Dean
Subject: RE: GEMS
1-11-14 South Carolina Export
Why is
it that this could not be in GEMS 1-11-14.xx. Given this type of release puts us in
a position where we have to go back to Metamor, at an expense and test to get
this release ITA certified. The
only release that South Carolina will accept is the one that is ITA
certified.
Has
this function been tested in the 1-17 series or does the same problem exist
there also.
Larry
J. Dix
Vice
President of Operations
Global
Election Systems
-----Original
Message-----
From:
owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Dmitry Papushin
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:39
AM
To:
bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Subject:
Re: GEMS 1-11-14 South Carolina Export
This is fixed and
will be in GEMS-1-11-15.
Dmitry
----- Original
Message -----
To: Bug Track
Sent: Monday, July 09,
2001 7:55 PM
Subject: GEMS 1-11-14 South
Carolina Export
Selecting
South Carolina Export in the Export Id window and clicking on the OK button in
GEMS 1-11-14 does not activate the South Carolina Export window, as it
should.
Nel