RE: VoterComment

["Ian S. Piper" <ian@dieboldes.com>]

Was this the printing problem associated with the HP2100 printer?

If so, we have one of these models in McKinney.  You could probably speak to
Mike Brown or Tyler Lincks and have either of them set up a test.  The
printer is in Deby Pullins office.  They would have to schedule the test
around her use of the printer.

Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf
Of Tari Runyan
Sent: May 14, 2001 8:14 PM
To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Subject: Re: VoterComment


I printed it both ways on my hp5 and did not get a watermark in either
case. - but I have never gotten one on this printer.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help
Tari
----- Original Message -----
From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>
To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: VoterComment


> I think I have fixed this problem but without a printer there is no way to
> confirm this.
>
> If the problem is what I think it is then the "watermark" should only
appear
> if you print directly from the SummaryReportDlg screen. If you preview the
> report and then print it from the preview screen the "watermark" should
not
> occur.  Can anyone confirm that this is the case?
>
> Tab
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Hintz" <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
> To: "Bugs List (E-mail)" <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:52 PM
> Subject: FW: VoterComment
>
>
> > Tom Schuhler from GBS sent me this e-mail below.  They were using GEMS
> > 1.17.7 and a HP 4000 printer.  I asked him if he knew what the printer
> > properties were set at, but could not tell me.  Unfortunately, I do not
> have
> > a HP 4000 printer to try and duplicate this problem.  I told him, that
it
> > possibly was something set within the printer properties and not coming
> from
> > GEMS.  Has anyone else seen this problem, or something similar???
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Schuhler [mailto:schuhler@ivcc.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 11:38 AM
> > To: jhglobal@earthlink.net
> > Cc: jvold@gbsvote.net
> > Subject: VoterComment
> >
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > On Election Night, 4/3/01, at DuPage County, Illinios, the text
> > "VoterComment" printed in the center of each page of the first GEMS
> Election
> > Summary Report that was printed.  The content of this report appeared to
> be
> > correct other than the fact that "VoterComment" was printed in the
center
> of
> > the each page overlaying whatever happened to be in the center of that
> page.
> > This report was printed before any memory cards were uploaded.
> >
> > When the final GEMS Election Summary Report was printed after all memory
> > cards were uploaded, the landscape option for the report was selected.
> The
> > text "VoterComment" did NOT appear on the final report.  It is also
> > important to note that we did not notice this text on any GEMS Election
> > Summary Reports we printed during DuPage pre-election testing prior to
> > 4/3/01.
> >
> > "VoterComment" is a field in the ChallengeVoter Table of the GEMS
> database.
> > I'm not sure what this field or table is used for.
> >
> > Do you have any idea why we saw "VoterComment"?  (Cathi Smothers of
Global
> > was at DuPage on Election Night.  I believe she saw the problem report
but
> > did not know the cause.  However, she might be able to provide
additional
> > details.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tom Schuhler
> >
>