Don't have 2.00f ROMS.
Ian, I can test it if you want to forward 2.00f
ROMS, but Fresno reports that this rate is far better than they had in
Nov.99
14" ballots in Marin.
Fresno, running 18" ballots had these errors while running their
Logic and Accuracy decks. Their feedback is that the ballots in
prior revisions would have these errors every 5 ballots or so. Now
we are up to every 20 to 30 or so, depending on... what I don't
know. I guess my question is: Is this related to strictly a
software issue, or is there some tolerance level of mark on the ballot
we're coming up against? Is this in the physical world of the
ballot or in the software or both??
Here is a
slightly shorter answer than Guy's. Roll back to 2.00f on the same
unit, feed the same ballots, and see if it actually improves anything.
That will answer your question.
Ken
|